PJ: I have not always been a political junkie, that is to say, I took a long break from the insanity of US politics from the early Clinton years until 2008. What drove me away was the insane disregard for civility in the way that the GOP went after the Clinton White House, accusing them of just about anything including murder. To be honest, that was simply the nail in the coffin since I had become disillusioned with the way things were going, the demogoguery and the partisan slant. Surprisingly, I used to support a lot of what the GOP stood for, at least fiscally, rarely socially. But when the party gave their hard right signal by focusing much of their platform on social issues and allowing religious issues to weigh heavily on their decicions I became disenchanted. I always looked to the US as that bastion of democracy where the seperation of church and state was a benefit not a crime. (I had watched the failure of many countries who had tried to let religious belief be the doctrine for their political agenda.) It was disheartening to watch the once Grand Old Party actively court the evangelical right then pander to them. I knew that it was only a matter of time before the party would no longer be the party of Eisenhower and Lincoln, of Reagan and Theodore Roosevelt.
My hiatus ended when I watched the 20008 presidential election, at first just in passing. I liked both Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama and didn't have anything against John McCain. A lot of people looking from the outside, just like me, felt the same, although many did have their favourite horse in the race. But things turned when Senator McCain pandered to the far right with his selection of Sarah Palin. While I should have turned my attention to other things I found that I could not. That cynical, gender specific and far right pandering decision to put a totally unqualified person on the ticket did more to change the tide in American politics than any other.
Mrs. Palin's star power was a media creation that would never have been given to a less attractive man or woman. She attained incredible star power even though she had little substance to offer her party. She was no match for the intellect of either Ronald Reagan or Margaret Thatcher but her fans tried to claim that she was their second coming. The Murdoch empire made her a best selling author of a ghost-written book and Fox News hired her as a political analyst. For the time, she became the voice of conservative politics.
It was becoming a crazy time with the Fox network promoting Glen Beck and his proven crazed theories and his constant rewriting of history. Fox seemed to also promote birther claims, helped sponsor The Tea Party and even seemed to encourage their hosts to question the new President's religious convictions and patriotism (with a lot of help from Fox's Sarah Palin). They actively supported the far right's claims that Obama was likely a Muslim (as if that is somehow a crime) and propagandized that he was a socialist.
The Tea Party was formed immediately after President Obama was elected and demanded lower taxes even though Obama had already signed legislation reducing the taxes of 95% of American citizens. The evangelical base grew louder and began (along with Glen Beck, Sarah Palin and The Tea Party) to claim the founding fathers as their own, insisting that there really is no seperation of church and state in the Constitution. And last, but sadly not least, the country was given "I'm not a witch" candidates and the current crop of far right demogogues were encouraged step up and join this year's presidential circus.
International Herald Tribune
First they went after the Rockefeller Republicans, but I was not a Rockefeller Republican. Then they went after the compassionate conservatives, but I was not a compassionate conservative. Then they went after the mainstream conservatives, and there was no one left to speak for me.
The Possum Republicans
By DAVID BROOKS
Politicians do what they must to get re-elected. So it’s not unexpected that Republican senators like Richard Lugar and Orrin Hatch would swing sharply to the right to fend off primary challengers.
As Jonathan Weisman reported in The Times on Sunday, Hatch has a lifetime rating of 78 percent from the ultra-free market Club for Growth, but, in the past two years, he has miraculously jumped to 100 percent and 99 percent, respectively. Lugar has earned widespread respect for his thoughtful manner and independent ways. Now he’s more of a reliable Republican foot soldier.
Still, it is worth pointing out that this behavior is not entirely honorable. It’s not honorable to adjust your true nature in order to win re-election. It’s not honorable to kowtow to the extremes so you can preserve your political career.
But, of course, this is exactly what has been happening in the Republican Party for the past half century. Over these decades, one pattern has been constant: Wingers fight to take over the party, mainstream Republicans bob and weave to keep their seats.
Republicans on the extreme ferociously attack their fellow party members. Those in the middle backpedal to avoid conflict. Republicans on the extreme are willing to lose elections in order to promote their principles. Those in the mainstream are quick to fudge their principles if it will help them get a short-term win.
In the 1960s and ’70s, the fight was between conservatives and moderates. Conservatives trounced the moderates and have driven them from the party. These days the fight is between the protesters and the professionals. The grass-roots protesters in the Tea Party and elsewhere have certain policy ideas, but they are not that different from the Republicans in the “establishment.”
The big difference is that the protesters don’t believe in governance. They have zero tolerance for the compromises needed to get legislation passed. They don’t believe in trimming and coalition building. For them, politics is more about earning respect and making a statement than it is about enacting legislation. It’s grievance politics, identity politics.
Of course, the professional politicians don’t want to get in the way of this torrent of passion and resentment. In private, they bemoan where the party is headed; in public they do nothing.
All across the nation, there are mainstream Republicans lamenting how the party has grown more and more insular, more and more rigid. This year, they have an excellent chance to defeat President Obama, yet the wingers have trashed the party’s reputation by swinging from one embarrassing and unelectable option to the next: Bachmann, Trump, Cain, Perry, Gingrich, Santorum.
But where have these party leaders been over the past five years, when all the forces that distort the G.O.P. were metastasizing? Where were they during the rise of Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck? Where were they when Arizona passed its beyond-the-fringe immigration law? Where were they in the summer of 2011 when the House Republicans rejected even the possibility of budget compromise? They were lying low, hoping the unpleasantness would pass.
The wingers call their Republican opponents RINOs, or Republican In Name Only. But that’s an insult to the rhino, which is a tough, noble beast. If RINOs were like rhinos, they’d stand up to those who seek to destroy them. Actually, what the country needs is some real Rhino Republicans. But the professional Republicans never do that. They’re not rhinos. They’re Opossum Republicans. They tremble for a few seconds then slip into an involuntary coma every time they’re challenged aggressively from the right.
Without real opposition, the wingers go from strength to strength. Under their influence, we’ve had a primary campaign that isn’t really an argument about issues. It’s a series of heresy trials in which each of the candidates accuse the others of tribal impurity. Two kinds of candidates emerge from this process: first, those who are forceful but outside the mainstream; second, those who started out mainstream but look weak and unprincipled because they have spent so much time genuflecting before those who despise them.
Neither is likely to win in the fall. Before the G.O.P. meshugana campaign, independents were leaning toward the G.O.P. But, in the latest Politico/George Washington University Battleground Poll, Obama leads Mitt Romney among independents by 49 percent to 27 percent.
Leaders of a party are supposed to educate the party, to police against its worst indulgences, to guard against insular information loops. They’re supposed to define a creed and establish boundaries. Republican leaders haven’t done that. Now the old pious cliché applies:
First they went after the Rockefeller Republicans, but I was not a Rockefeller Republican. Then they went after the compassionate conservatives, but I was not a compassionate conservative. Then they went after the mainstream conservatives, and there was no one left to speak for me.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/28/opinion/brooks-the-possum-republicans.html?_r=1
No comments:
Post a Comment